Grant’s Bracket 1/29

Through and including games played on Monday, January 28th

  1. Tennessee, Duke, Michigan, Virginia
  2. Gonzaga, Kentucky, Kansas, Michigan State
  3. Marquette, Nevada, North Carolina, Villanova
  4. Houston, Louisville, Purdue, Iowa State
  5. LSU, Virginia Tech, Maryland, Kansas State
  6. Texas Tech, Florida State, Wisconsin, Oklahoma
  7. Mississippi State, Syracuse, Cincinnati, Buffalo
  8. TCU, Minnesota, Iowa, Auburn
  9. St. Johns, Ole Miss, UCF, Seton Hall
  10. Temple, Baylor, Alabama, Ohio State
  11. Arizona State, Nebraska, Washington, North Carolina State, Indiana, Texas
  12. Wofford, Lipscomb, Hofstra, Murray State
  13. VCU, Yale, New Mexico State, Vermont
  14. Northern Kentucky, Texas State, North Texas, South Dakota State
  15. Radford, Montana, Drake, UC Irvine
  16. Lehigh, Rider, Abilene Christian, Fairleigh Dickinson, Texas Southern, Norfolk State

First Four Out: Davidson, Creighton, UNC Greensboro, Butler

Next Four Out: Florida, Clemson, Memphis, Saint Louis

Third Four Out: Pittsburgh, Arizona, Oregon, Utah State

Also Considered (In Order): San Francisco, Liberty, Saint Mary’s, Northwestern, Toledo, Arkansas, Oklahoma State, ETSU, Belmont, Providence, USC, Oregon State, UConn, Furman, South Florida, Fresno State, Missouri, Xavier, Penn, Grand Canyon, Georgia, Georgetown, Utah, Penn State, Georgia Tech,  Notre Dame, Vanderbilt, Ball State, Dayton, UCLA, San Diego


Differences of 3+ Seedlines from the Matrix:

North Carolina State, 11 vs 8

I’m not sure why there’s so much slack for this team. Their SOS is 277 and NC SOS is even worse at 349. Their best win…and only win against a tournament team from this projection is at home against a decreasingly impressive Auburn team. Not to mention a bad loss at Wake Forest. It’s hard to believe I still have a team like that in the tournament (see note below).


Other Finds

  1. This bracket has the Big Ten receiving 10 bids. I don’t think this will end up happening as that third tier (Minnesota, Iowa, Ohio State, Nebraska, and Indiana) continue to beat up on one another. I think at least two of the five above fall behind and the Big Ten gets closer to 8 teams in.
  2. It’s seemingly mentioned every year that it’s a “weak bubble.” I do my best to fight that recency effect by instead comparing the quality of this year’s resumes to those of the last four in and first four out contenders in prior years at this time. That being said…this year is shaping up to be a weak bubble. Starting around the 9 line, everyone seems to be ranked at the very least two seedlines better than similar resumes in the past. Hopefully, this opens things up for midmajors like UNC Greensboro, San Francisco, and Liberty (or if they end up falling in their conference tournament, Wofford, Lipscomb, Hofstra, and Murray State).
  3. I personally feel there’s a top 8 starting to separate themselves. The one and two seedlines feel like they’re playing a different level of basketball, one more consistent with tournament success. Not to disrespect teams like Marquette, Nevada, and North Carolina, who clearly have talent and can win on any given day, but the top 8 right now have the talent and the consistency.

Let me know your thoughts on this format. Do you like the extra analysis?


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s